Thursday, May 9, 2024

REPUBLICANS AND CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM

By Ruth A. Sheets

As a Christian minister, I am appalled so many people in this country are trying to force Christianity and supposed "christian" beliefs on the people of this nation. Each time I hear Republicans whining that this nation isn't christian enough, I groan because those hypocrites do not in any way embody or care about what I would consider Christian precepts, and they are fine with the hypocrisy, perhaps even revel in it. They lie, approve cheating/fraud if it gets them what they want while claiming it isn't cheating/fraud, and choose leaders who have questionable backgrounds and intentions (Jordan, Gates, Greene, Johnson, Trump, the judges in Alabama, the ones who push the 10 Commandments while they choose not to live by them), and those who regularly spew hate of everyone who is not them.  They want the government up in everyone's business but theirs. 

NOTE:  The lower-case “c” used in Christian indicates non-Christian behavior and CNs is Christian Nationalists.

The CNs have tried to shape Christianity to reflect their own personal biases, behaviors, comforts, fears, and hatreds. Lying has become their coin of the realm and they do it so often there is little sense of what is true for them. They themselves, may not even know.

There is nothing in Jesus's teachings that supports their attitudes, behavior, lying, faith being forced on others, and the rest of their Republican/CN agenda. If Jesus had been so opposed to homosexuality, for example, he would have said so since it was present within the Greek/Roman world of which Jesus was part. The same can be said of abortion.  However, the CNs have put these issues at the center of their campaigns against the American people, claiming they are “pro-life” so God must be against both LGBTQ persons and abortion because they are.

The scriptures do say Jesus told folks:  love one another, love your neighbor as yourself (and everyone is our neighbor), welcome the stranger, blessed are the peacemakers, forgive 70 times 7 times, care for poor and sick folks, visit those in prison, do unto others what you would have done to yourself.  I see none of these critical Christian precepts in anything CNs are pushing.  When Republican CNs notice the national debt is really high, to fix it, they propose that cuts be made to the programs that support the people who are most vulnerable, actions that are antithetical to what the Jesus of the gospels would have stood for and with. 

I have noticed over the years that conservatives grab onto an issue they feel will get them attention, then wield it as a weapon supposedly of God, to get others to give them power, money, or something else they want. Right now, it’s controlling women’s lives, in particular, abortion rights, and giving their faithful minions, folks to hate (LGBTQ persons and immigrants).  We all should know what Republicans are up to by now, but these fools keep winning elections, claiming to be soooo christian, having the “true faith” or something like that.  That’s a message people have spewed throughout history to force others to do their bidding.  Republicans keep coming up with warped "ideas" trying to make this a Christian nation despite the fact that the United States was never intended to be a Christian state no matter what Republicans believe about our founders.  I think I have the actual translation for what Republicans are really saying when they claim this as a christian country; “we want to be able to do whatever we want with impunity and claim  that what we are doing and proposing is Christian, thus from god.”  They expect/require everyone to go along with it.”  Sounds a lot like Republicans wish to go back to being toddlers with bad parents, whining and tantruming as they try to get whatever they want.  Clearly, Republican leadership right now does not care about any honest traditional form of Christianity because it does not speak to their childish need to get power and money no matter who is hurt.  Conservative christianity has become the Republican weapon of choice to gain undeserved power, to continue to live their distorted beliefs, and to do as much harm as possible to anyone who does not go along with their nonsense.  There are probably “true believers,” but I suspect those “believers” are not among the leadership.  The leaders know what they are doing and have been carefully crafting their attack on our democracy to be sure it has a “christian” ring to it designed to hook people who have been groomed to fear, resent, even hate those who do not see the world as they do.  “Those people are just so different, they’re trying to convert you to wokeness (or something); so they must be stopped.”  That is a powerful message for those who know nothing of our Constitution, little of our history or rights as citizens, and that they are being used by conservative religious leaders and politicians for their own gains, not to improve the lives of their congregants and constituents.  They are reviving the old mollifying line used during slavery days, you may suffer now while on Earth, but god will bless you and you will face eternity in Heaven if you do what we say.”

That seems legitimate to Americans who are actually looking for some kind of approval for their racism, misogyny, homo/transphobia, xenophobia, and the rest.  Republicans in power hold that their voters really are useful and “it is our duty as good christians to ‘guide’ them in the right direction because they aren’t dependable enough to buy our lies without help.”  The leadership wants the sheep to say, with a straight face, “since god is OK with what my leaders in god’s party are doing, I must be right.  Those other horrible people are trying to force us to mix together with sinners and we won’t have it!” 

We the People and our media should not tolerate this false christianity without rebuttal. Republicans can worship in any way they choose.  What they can’t do is foist their brand of religion on anyone else; it’s in our Constitution.  That can be a problem, though because our Supreme Court has drunk the Republican Kool-Ade, so are regularly ruling in favor of the Christian Nationalists, even when they don’t have standing before the court or even an actual case.  We may have to go around the Supreme Court somewhat, as Gov. Abbott of Texas has lately to do as much harm to immigrants as he can get away with.  In this case, it will be to defend our rights and liberties from people for whom the Constitution is just a suggestion and swearing an oath to “protect and defend” it is pretty much irrelevant because they have their fingers crossed, at least mentally, so whatever they swear or affirm means little or nothing to them.  In addition, they get The Federalist Society and other rich guys to buy and supply members of our courts.  The judges and justices can then push for the oppression of people not like themselves.  They will rule in favor of pseudo-christian practices, against our Constitution, while quoting pre-18th Century bullies as proof they are right.  The opinion of the judges and justices has more weight than the Constitution, the law, or common sense, which of course, is just wrong. 

Six of the Supreme Court justices are Roman Catholic and a seventh nearly so (Gorsuch was raised Catholic but is now Episcopalian).  That is definitely not representative of the American people, and many of their recent decisions related to religion are not either.    

An additional factor in Christian Nationalism is that the vast majority of its practitioners are white Evangelicals and Roman Catholics, leaving out a whole lot of Christians who don’t go along with their racism, misogyny, homo/transphobia, xenophobia, and the rest.  Among the rights the CNs wish to eliminate is voting rights for the people they don’t see as worthy.  Black Americans have been specifically targeted in “red” states as have young people and people with disabilities, clearly in opposition to the  Constitution which gives the right to vote to every American citizen age 18 and older.  How this fits with Christianity is not entirely clear.  Perhaps it is that CNs are truly dictators (for god of course).

We need to get the word out more forcefully that the Germans who conducted the Holocaust were Christians who used their faith as a weapon against millions ultimately murdering millions.  It was Christians who operated the slave trade enslaving tens of millions of people.  It was Christians who lynched Black Americans and people who supported them.  It was Christians who marched with the KKK yelling stupid phrases like “Jews won’t replace us” while now claiming to be so pro-Israel.  I guess they hate Muslims/Palestinians more than Jews.

Donald Trump is a Christian Nationalist as are Mike Johnson and numerous other members of our legislative bodies.  Trump claims the Bible is his favorite book, and is selling his own version to raise money for his cause, himself.  We should not try to trip him up with verses to see if he knows them because he does not.  He has never read the Bible and never will.  It is his fave book because he can use it to stir up the people who value it, those who have been raised to question nothing their masters tell them, and it is always their masters because women are lesser beings.  So, if Trump says it’s a favorite and he is selling it, he is speaking just to them and his words go straight to their heart, and the lie sticks with them and they stick with Trump. 

There is nothing positive about Christian Nationalism for anyone but its practitioners in leadership roles, and it is up to us, those of many different faiths or none to stand up to them and challenge them at every opportunity.  One way is to vote them out of office.  Another is to insist that our media call the CNs out on their bad behavior and call their lies, lies.  We are not a theocracy no matter what the CNs want. 

The question is, will we let ourselves be ruled by people who have so little regard for the truth or Truths.  For me, the answer is NO!

Sunday, May 5, 2024

THE ROGUE SUPREMES, PART A LOT

By Ruth A. Sheets

I hope everyone was as embarrassed as I was last week when our Supreme Court heard two cases, neither of which should have even come to them.  The first about whether Idaho can refuse medical help to women whose pregnancies are in trouble, and the second, whether Donald Trump has immunity for the crimes he committed while president and after. 

I was shocked as well as embarrassed by the conservatives' disregard for the truth, dismissal of reality, ignorance of women's rights to life, and pretending Donald Trump needed immunity to carry out his duties as president.  The six conservatives are all supposed to be lawyers who know our Constitution, all of it, including the amendments, as well as the laws of our nation.  If I were one of their law school professors, I would have been appalled and frustrated at how little they had learned or how badly they had been corrupted over the years. 

There have been clues all along that these 5 men and one woman are not worthy of being on our highest court and were only nominated and passed because of their ideological stances or to meet particular political needs of the president in office at the time of the nomination.  They regularly rule in favor of very rich individuals and corporations.  They have undermined the rights of people of color and women as often as they thought they could get away with it, and they have employed neither a moral compass or any kind of ethics code in their rulings.  I hold Chief Justice John Roberts responsible for most of it, but the others jump right in working to dismantle our democracy.  When they were being vetted, no discernable effort was made to determine whether each functioned with a moral compass or could discern truth from lies, and reality from rich guy fantasyland, and any Senator who voted for them is also to blame. 

Clarence Thomas was credibly accused of sexual harassment but the woman who was his target was maligned rather than holding responsible the man who would be given a life term on our highest court. 

Samuel Alito had racist and misogynistic tendencies in previous jobs, but somehow, George W. Bush picked him and set him loose on Americans, just waiting to put women under male control has he saw as the reality back in the 17th century or earlier. 

John Roberts had a strong racist position against the Voting Rights Act which he was rather open about, a Voting Rights Act passed several times, mostly unanimously.  That Act made it necessary for the states that had done the most to limit voting for people of color required to get permission to make any voting changes.  Roberts got the chance to ditch the most important parts of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 and whenever a gerrymandering case comes up that would correct inequities in voting, he will nix it, with rare exceptions.  He’s not fond of women’s rights either and proves that regularly too.

Brett Kavanaugh was credibly accused of sexual assault, but somehow, Republicans didn’t see that as a problem at all, even the women on the Judiciary Committee. 

Amy Coney Barrett had so little experience as a judge it is clear she got to join the Supremes because she was biddable, willing to go along with whatever Trump and his Justice “friends” commanded.  Her cultlike upbringing in a super conservative religious group primed her to be that kind of submissive gal and she rarely steps out of line.  She’s also a Christian nationalist which is completely against the Constitution, of course. 

In addition to all that, the most recent three Trump justices lied in their Senate hearings.  They all said precedent was critical and it would take a lot for them to overturn precedent.  Well, actually, not that much, just an Alito manifesto that cited a 17th Century witch-hunter to take away women’s right to choose, leaving it to the states and in nearly half the states, abortion is illegal or severely restricted, supposedly for religious reasons, of course.   And you thought we had freedom of religion.  So did I. 

In the first hearing last week, the state of Idaho claimed that it should not have to treat pregnant women who claimed to need an abortion, until they were near death (or some such nonsense, their argument was really not clear, but it didn’t matter to the conservatives).  It was clear to me that the woman’s life, in the conservatives’ eyes would/should be irrelevant.  It was not possible to figure out what the justices wanted or what the  state’s lawyer in the court wanted either, but one can guess.  What will be the next target for further harming women?  It is guaranteed there will be one because people who get off on cruelty have to keep going, and these guys will.  

When the “Trump immunity hearing” opened, it was clear at least most of the conservative justices were entertaining giving immunity to Donald Trump, whining that if they didn’t, future presidents would be hard put to do their jobs (it’s unclear what they thought those future presidents’ duties would involve that would require immunity).  Should one be immune from leading a coup, from stealing documents and sharing them with unauthorized people, imprisoning or even killing an opponent?   Would presidential immunity cover putting people in concentration camps, deporting 11 million people who have lived here for decades, calling out the National Guard to attack protesters, undermining our democracy, destroying our foreign relations including letting Israel do whatever it wants to the Palestinians and Putin to do whatever he wants to Ukraine?  The last set is not hypothetical because those are things along with a whole lot more, that Donald Trump, candidate has said he plans to do on his first day in office as dictator. 

It is hard to believe the conservative justices are not aware of the rantings of Donald Trump, a man with no ideas, and even less of a moral compass than they have.  Then, there’s Trump’s dementia and delusions of grandeur.  He needs his handlers just to function at all.  I admit I was surprised when Justice Barrett spoke up slightly challenging the lawyers who were asking essentially for freedom to let women die rather than let them have a needed abortion.  She did ask a mild question about a problem with giving  Trump immunity.  Being female, her questions were essentially ignored as were those of the other female justices who had far better questions and comments than the men. 

The Idaho and Trump lawyers’ presentations were pathetic and just plain wrong-headed, but the points made by the male justices were inept as were their  questions.  The hearings were very hard  to listen to.  I kept thinking “this is the 21st century, how are either of these cases being argued now?”  We have a 40-year law on the books called EMTALA (the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) However, politicians in Idaho and other states are arguing that their strict anti-abortion laws and in whatever way they choose to prosecute them supersede federal law.  If the Supremes agree with that insanity, it would mean hospitals would be forced to turn away pregnant patients, denying them crucial, life-saving care.  Too bad, gals, a bunch of old white “Christian” men don’t care if you live or die, just that you keep that fetus inside your body for the right length of time, you know, the time those ignorant men decide for you.  After that, you’re on your own until you get pregnant again.  Oh yes, don’t ask for any help raising that baby even if it has extreme disabilities because it must be your fault.

Our congress needs to wake up and begin serious SC reforms before they drag us out of our democracy into something none of us should want to contemplate.  They are working on it.  Their delaying tactics to keep Donald Trump from being tried for inciting insurrection and stealing documents proves they care nothing for this nation and keeping us safe from a power-crazy sociopathic liar, cheat, and dictator wannabee.  I have to wonder, what do they get from it those rogue justices?