By Ruth A. Sheets
Republicans today want power! They want money too, and
they want whiteness to be supreme (Jesus was white, you know, or so they
believe).
Many Republican leaders who still claim to be Christian,
have bought into a "prosperity gospel" which tells them if they are
rich and powerful, they deserve it; god did it for them. They aren’t
concerned with how they got there, because they believe they are truly in God’s
favor, God was guiding them through their business life, their legal duties,
their use of family riches, etc., so if they “sneaked” a bit from someone or
didn’t pay employees what they earned a few times, or skipped taxes, or lied
about an opponent, God knew and it was OK because God had forgiven them,
right? Isn’t it interesting that with this kind of “prosperity gospel,”
God seems to only forgive them for their deeds, not others
involved in the same practices? And, whatever they don’t like is
disliked by God, and therefore, a sin to be opposed at every opportunity.
The new prosperity gospelers don’t really care what
traditional Christianity believes or does because they regularly get
revelations from God and anyone who gets in their way is a sinner, the
enemy. Not in the Bible? Of course it is, you just have to read it
right!
The “Christian” white right’s efforts are moving toward
making sure their beliefs become the law of the land. That’s what they
want to believe is God’s will, and they will get to be in charge of
“god’s will.”
Currently, we have at least 4 members of the Supreme Court
and numerous members of Congress and even more members of state legislatures on
board with this effort. Theirs is a fanatical religious evolution that
took about 45 years to fully develop. Republicans and conservatives were
having trouble getting traction for their message after Watergate, so needed
something to motivate themselves and others of their kind: white,
straight, male, “Christians.” The one issue that had potential was the
Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade. Abortion! What a great
idea! Claim abortion was a horrific sin, murdering a baby in the
womb. How dare those sluts do something so terrible. I bet God
doesn’t like that. They also knew they had to get some loud-mouthed women
on board or a lot of women would have ignored the men. Phyllis Schlafly
was perfect for the job. And, as a power-obsessed lawyer, she knew just
how to reach and manipulate vulnerable women who were scared of the changes
feminism was bringing about. All these years later, the pieces were in
place.
The Conservatives on the Supreme Court this year just knew
this was the time to dump Roe v. Wade despite precedent, despite a majority of
Americans not wanting it overturned, despite having no real argument to support
the decision, they said “OK states, do your best,” and they did. There is
now chaos throughout the Confederacy and the confederate wannabee states.
The most the conservative court under the pen of Justice Alito could do
was claim abortion wasn’t in the Constitution, so it wasn’t protected by
it. That, of course is nonsense, especially when the only sources for
Alito’s argument were Medieval white men who were misogynists, just like the
Court’s conservatives. Neat, huh!
The prosperity gospelers claim the 1st Amendment
gives them the right to force their Christian beliefs on this country because
the founders wanted it to be a Christian nation. These folks have no
idea, nor care, what the founders intended regarding religion. Even if
they knew that many of the founders were Deists or held religious beliefs they
didn't share publicly is irrelevant to them. The Bill of Rights declares
no establishment of religion in the first amendment, but folks like Justice
Barrett see all that as just words she doesn't have to follow because she has
god's ear (or some other irrelevance) and her super-Catholic cult lets her know
what God wants for this country, prosperity gospel Christianity where the haves
have because God likes them better than God likes the have-nots.
Conservative Christian faith does not include folks who don't believe what they
do, rather childish, but just what one might expect. One’s personal
religion shouldn’t be involved in any decision-making by our courts, but alas, the
conservative justices don’t care about the oath they swore, it was just their
way into a lucrative job for life.
I just read an article by Dennis Prager in “townhall.com, (a
very right-wing site), called “Why Are So Many Young Americans
Irreligious? The Secular Brainwashing is the First Reason.” As you
can imagine, the article is full of the usual anti-left stuff regularly pumped
out by conservatives: “can’t say ‘Merry Christmas (happy holidays), can’t
have Christmas parties or Christmas break” (holiday party, winter break).
Young people have abandoned religion because of the anti-religion stance “the
power of the dominant secular culture, the failure of faithful Christians (and
Jews) to properly explain their religion to the young, and every public
institution has been made ‘god-free.’” Ridiculous!
The author whines on that schools don’t refer to god and the
Bible and actually hold both in contempt. (I must have mist that
one.) He claims also with no evidence that religion is held by public schools
to be an impediment to children’s learning. The article continues on in
that vein claiming it is brainwashing on the left that has turned young people
from religion. In schools mentioning other faiths is permitted, but not
Christianity (of course, not true). He whines that inside and outside
home, religion is disparaged, again with no evidence, just his personal feeling
or the claim of his church.
He wraps the article up saying that this “post-Christian
age” has been “the bloodiest” in history. This man has no clue.
Most Nazis were Christian and Stalin and Mao were Communists. Together
they were responsible for more deaths than anything since. Unfortunately,
Prager has folks out there who believe his manufactured “truths,” and will try
to use them to push religious fundamentalism on our country. Prager said
young people aren’t religious, so in his new order, are they supposed to be
forced into religion? If so, who is going to do that? And, what
about the people who are Christian or not Christian who don’t want religion
thrown in their faces every day?
Besides, young people from all backgrounds have been witness
lately, to a whole lot of bad behavior on the part of conservative Christians
in power. They have seen women losing bodily autonomy, just
because. They have seen LGBTQ persons threatened with the loss of their
human rights. They saw an insurgency by white Christians who tried to
take over our government on behalf of a non-religious man. They have seen
hospitals refuse to treat women in crisis because a fetus is seen as more
valuable than the woman carrying it. They have seen white Christian
police officers shoot down or suffocate Black men. They have experienced
the presidency of a man those conservative Christians revere who cheats, lied
over 30,000 times in public while in office, then stole secret documents from
the White House while he was leaving. In short, if that is Christianity,
what would entice young people to want a part of it?
I am a person of faith and do believe the Christianity of
the social gospel has something to offer young people, but it is not my role to
force anyone to choose or reject Christianity or any other religion.
People of faith need to stand more forcefully for church and
state being separate strands in life, maybe, each supporting but not dominating
the other. We need to talk about it more and why the separation is
essential.
There is a move in some more liberal churches to go back to
some kind of heavier embrace of scripture, I guess to prove our faith is as
real as Justice Barrett’s seems to be. I do not approve. The
scriptures of any religion can give guidance, but they have definite limitations,
particularly when they are nit-picked to glean pearls to “cast before
swine.”
I and many others are advocates for a social gospel
that is inclusive, accepting, and requires us to increase people's rights to
life, liberty, and the pursuit of opportunity. What I believe guides my
life but I don't need other people to believe what I do as Justice Barrett, the
other conservatives on the Supreme Court, and their ilk do. We who are
for separation need to speak up often and clearly that we don’t want public religious
demonstrations when they are coercive and just for show as that school coach’s
50 yard line BS was. When we see that nonsense, we need to interrupt with
more positive activities, like maybe a drum circle or a quick concert of love
songs that will drown out their stuff. They will still be able to do
their thing as Justice Barrett and her kin want, but it will be positively
challenged by the much larger coalition of people who value religious freedom,
that is freedom to believe or not believe and even more important, freedom not
to be dictated to by an extreme Supreme Court or anyone else.